Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsSt Peters ward20/00327/S
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

20/00327/S.

1-3 Corbridge Cresent And 1-4 The Oval, London E2 9DS

Discharge of Conditions at 1-3 Corbridge Cresent And 1-4 The Oval, London E2 9DS — permit on 28 May 2020 (delegated, Adam Garcia).

Tower HamletsSt Peters20/00327/S
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Permit
Outcome
28 May 2020
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Submission of Details Pursuant to Condition No.17 part iv, v, vi (Full Details of the Biodiversity Mitigation), 18 parts i, ii, iii, iv, vi, vii, viii, ix (Landscaping Plan) and 26 (Full Details of the Proposed Photovoltaic (PV) Array) of of Planning Permission Ref: PA/19/02060 dated: 17/04/2020.

Reference
20/00327/S
Type
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
14 Feb 2020
Decision date
28 May 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
20/00327/S
Type
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Show all 13 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
14 Feb 2020
Decision date
28 May 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Permit on 28 May 2020, delegated decision by Adam Garcia.

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Feb 2020
Application validated
28 May 2020
Delegated decision: Permit · Adam Garcia
14 Feb 2020
Application validated
28 May 2020
Delegated decision: Permit · Adam Garcia

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.