Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsMile End wardPA/01/01534
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/01/01534.

644 - 646 Mile End Road, London

Advertisement at 644 - 646 Mile End Road, London — approved on 13 Mar 2002 (delegated, Rochelle Friend).

Tower HamletsMile EndPA/01/01534
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Mar 2002
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection and display of externally illuminated fascia signs.

Reference
PA/01/01534
Type
Advertisement Consent
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
24 Jan 2002
Target date
20 Mar 2002
Decision date
13 Mar 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
PA/01/01534
Type
Advertisement Consent
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
24 Jan 2002
Target date
20 Mar 2002
Decision date
13 Mar 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
CMGM/FL/0B
21 Mar 2002
CMGM/FL/04/A
21 Mar 2002
ADVERTISEMENT CONSENT
21 Mar 2002
ADVERT
4 Jan 2002
OS Extract
4 Jan 2002
CMGM/FL/0B
21 Mar 2002
CMGM/FL/04/A
21 Mar 2002
ADVERTISEMENT CONSENT
21 Mar 2002
Show all 5 rows
ADVERT
4 Jan 2002
OS Extract
4 Jan 2002

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 Mar 2002, delegated decision by Rochelle Friend.

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Jan 2002
Application validated
20 Mar 2002
Statutory target date
13 Mar 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Rochelle Friend
24 Jan 2002
Application validated
20 Mar 2002
Statutory target date
13 Mar 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Rochelle Friend

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.