Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsPoplar wardPA/03/00744
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/03/00744.

10 East India Dock Road, London, E14 6JJ

Full / Other Planning at 10 East India Dock Road, London, E14 6JJ — refused on 5 Aug 2003 (delegated, Ben Hignett).

Tower HamletsPoplarE14 6JJPA/03/00744
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Aug 2003
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use of ground floor and basement to restaurant (Class A3) with residential on upper 3 floors including installation of a new front door.

Reference
PA/03/00744
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E14 6JJ
Ward
Received
Validated
10 Jun 2003
Target date
5 Aug 2003
Decision date
5 Aug 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
PA/03/00744
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E14 6JJ
Ward
Received
Validated
10 Jun 2003
Target date
5 Aug 2003
Decision date
5 Aug 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSAL OF FULL PLANNING PERMISSION
15 Sept 2003
Application Form
17 Jun 2003
OS Extract
17 Jun 2003
3818/08
17 Jun 2003
REFUSAL OF FULL PLANNING PERMISSION
15 Sept 2003
Application Form
17 Jun 2003
OS Extract
17 Jun 2003
Show all 4 rows
3818/08
17 Jun 2003

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Aug 2003, delegated decision by Ben Hignett.

Timeline

Date
Event
10 Jun 2003
Application validated
5 Aug 2003
Statutory target date
5 Aug 2003
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Hignett
10 Jun 2003
Application validated
5 Aug 2003
Statutory target date
5 Aug 2003
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Hignett

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.