Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsSt Peters wardPA/14/03219/R
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/14/03219/R.

SCHEME 1:- 1-3 Corbridge Crescent And 1-4 The Oval, London

Full / Other Planning at SCHEME 1:- 1-3 Corbridge Crescent And 1-4 The Oval, London — no determination on 20 Jun 2016 (delegated, Adam Williams).

Tower HamletsSt PetersPA/14/03219/R
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
No determination
Outcome
20 Jun 2016
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
116
Documents
116 linked
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing buildings and erection of three linked blocks of 3 to 18 storeys comprising 90 dwellings, communal and private amenity space and 337m2 of commercial floorspace (B1/D1). [Amended proposal: Changes to ground floor layout and frontage, omission of basement car parking, reduction in number of dwellings by 1 unit, increase in commercial floorspace of 5sqm, submission of revised Transport Statement and Delivery & Servicing Plan]

Reference
PA/14/03219/R
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Case officer
Received
Validated
18 Nov 2014
Target date
17 Feb 2015
Decision date
20 Jun 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
PA/14/03219/R
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Received
Validated
18 Nov 2014
Target date
17 Feb 2015
Decision date
20 Jun 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPEAL - LBTH CLOSING STATEMENT
8 Aug 2016
APPEAL - COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE - SCHEME 1
8 Aug 2016
APPEAL DECISION - DISMISSED
23 Jun 2016
PINS BESPOKE PROGRAMME
13 May 2016
PLANNING INSPECTORATE EMAIL DATED 28.4.2016
9 May 2016
PINS LETTER RELATING TO CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS MADE BY
3 May 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - PETER STE
13 Apr 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - CHRIS MIE
13 Apr 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - CHRIS MIE
13 Apr 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - CHRIS MIE
13 Apr 2016
APPEAL - LBTH CLOSING STATEMENT
8 Aug 2016
APPEAL - COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE - SCHEME 1
8 Aug 2016
APPEAL DECISION - DISMISSED
23 Jun 2016
Show all 10 rows
PINS BESPOKE PROGRAMME
13 May 2016
PLANNING INSPECTORATE EMAIL DATED 28.4.2016
9 May 2016
PINS LETTER RELATING TO CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS MADE BY
3 May 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - PETER STE
13 Apr 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - CHRIS MIE
13 Apr 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - CHRIS MIE
13 Apr 2016
APPELLANTS PROOF OF EVIDENCE - WITNESS STATEMENT - CHRIS MIE
13 Apr 2016

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

No determination on 20 Jun 2016, delegated decision by Adam Williams.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Nov 2014
Application validated
17 Feb 2015
Statutory target date
20 Jun 2016
Delegated decision: No determination · Adam Williams
18 Nov 2014
Application validated
17 Feb 2015
Statutory target date
20 Jun 2016
Delegated decision: No determination · Adam Williams

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.