Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsSt Katharines and Wapping wardPA/97/00044
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/97/00044.

Former 94-96 Wapping High Street, E1 (St Katharines Ward)

Full / Other Planning at Former 94-96 Wapping High Street, E1 (St Katharines Ward) — approved on 27 Jan 1998 by committee.

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Approved
Outcome
27 Jan 1998
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use and refurbishment of existing building to provide 17 residential units, with associated car parking provision, together with internal and external alterations and extensions to the roof.

Reference
PA/97/00044
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
12 Jan 1998
Target date
8 Mar 1998
Decision date
27 Jan 1998
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Reference
PA/97/00044
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
12 Jan 1998
Target date
8 Mar 1998
Decision date
27 Jan 1998
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 27 Jan 1998, determined by the planning committee.

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Jan 1998
Application validated
8 Mar 1998
Statutory target date
27 Jan 1998
Committee decision: Approved
12 Jan 1998
Application validated
8 Mar 1998
Statutory target date
27 Jan 1998
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.