Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsBethnal Green wardPA/98/00872
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/98/00872.

Former Block C, Advance Wharf and Twig Folly Wharf, Roman Road, E2 (St.James Ward)

Full / Other Planning at Former Block C, Advance Wharf and Twig Folly Wharf, Roman Road, E2 (St.James Ward) — approved on 21 Aug 1998 (delegated, Peter Minoletti).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Approved
Outcome
21 Aug 1998
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Addition of six balconies at first and second floor levels on northern elevation-fronting canal-(to match those on Blocks A and B).

Reference
PA/98/00872
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
15 Jul 1998
Target date
9 Sep 1998
Decision date
21 Aug 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
PA/98/00872
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
15 Jul 1998
Target date
9 Sep 1998
Decision date
21 Aug 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 21 Aug 1998, delegated decision by Peter Minoletti.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Jul 1998
Application validated
9 Sep 1998
Statutory target date
21 Aug 1998
Delegated decision: Approved · Peter Minoletti
15 Jul 1998
Application validated
9 Sep 1998
Statutory target date
21 Aug 1998
Delegated decision: Approved · Peter Minoletti

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.