Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsPoplar wardE14 0AFTower Hamlets College, 112 Poplar High Street, London, E14 0AFPA/99/00522
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/99/00522.

Tower Hamlets College, 112 Poplar High Street, London, E14 0AF

Discharge of Conditions at Tower Hamlets College, 112 Poplar High Street, London, E14 0AF — approved on 27 Sep 2000 (delegated, Edward Oteng).

Tower HamletsPoplarE14 0AFPA/99/00522
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Approved
Outcome
27 Sep 2000
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Approval of details pursuant to Condition 2 (b) of planning permission granted on 1.4.99 ref: PA/98/1543

Reference
PA/99/00522
Type
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Received
Validated
7 May 1999
Target date
2 Jul 1999
Decision date
27 Sep 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
PA/99/00522
Type
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Received
Validated
7 May 1999
Target date
2 Jul 1999
Decision date
27 Sep 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 27 Sep 2000, delegated decision by Edward Oteng.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 May 1999
Application validated
2 Jul 1999
Statutory target date
27 Sep 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · Edward Oteng
7 May 1999
Application validated
2 Jul 1999
Statutory target date
27 Sep 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · Edward Oteng

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.