Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Tower Hamlets›…Bromley South ward›PL/96/00048
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PL/96/00048.

Former C.A. Coutts, Violet Road,London, E.3 (lansbury Ward)

Full / Other Planning at Former C.A. Coutts, Violet Road,London, E.3 (lansbury Ward) — approved on 4 Jul 1997 by committee.

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Approved
Outcome
4 Jul 1997
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
—
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Extension to existing factory in Violet Road.

Reference
PL/96/00048
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
2 May 1996
Target date
27 Jun 1996
Decision date
4 Jul 1997
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
PL/96/00048
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
2 May 1996
Target date
27 Jun 1996
Decision date
4 Jul 1997
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
S106 AGREEMENT SIGNED 4TH JULY 1997
17 May 2010
S106 AGREEMENT SIGNED 4TH JULY 1997
17 May 2010

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 4 Jul 1997, determined by the planning committee.

Timeline

Date
Event
2 May 1996
Application validated
27 Jun 1996
Statutory target date
4 Jul 1997
Committee decision: Approved
2 May 1996
Application validated
27 Jun 1996
Statutory target date
4 Jul 1997
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.