Planning application · Tower Hamlets
PA/14/01453/R.
89 Cheshire Street, London 6EG
Full / Other Planning at 89 Cheshire Street, London 6EG — refused on 22 Jul 2014 (delegated, Beth Eite).
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Jul 2014
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
—
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
First and second floor rear extension
Reference
PA/14/01453/R
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
2 Jun 2014
Target date
28 Jul 2014
Decision date
22 Jul 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
PA/14/01453/R
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
2 Jun 2014
Target date
28 Jul 2014
Decision date
22 Jul 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 22 Jul 2014, delegated decision by Beth Eite.
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Jun 2014
Application validated
28 Jul 2014
Statutory target date
22 Jul 2014
Delegated decision: Refused · Beth Eite
2 Jun 2014
Application validated
28 Jul 2014
Statutory target date
22 Jul 2014
Delegated decision: Refused · Beth Eite
Public response
Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.