Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsWhitechapel wardE1 8EY129 Leman Street, London, E1 8EYPA/97/01066
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

PA/97/01066.

129 Leman Street, London, E1 8EY

Lawful Development Certificate at 129 Leman Street, London, E1 8EY — approved on 13 Feb 1998 (delegated, Mike Thorp).

Tower HamletsWhitechapelE1 8EYPA/97/01066
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Feb 1998
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of Lawfulness for an existing ground floor and basement restaurant use and first and second floor residential use.

Reference
PA/97/01066
Type
XXX - Cert of Lawful Dev - DO NOT USE
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
Validated
7 Nov 1997
Target date
2 Jan 1998
Decision date
13 Feb 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
PA/97/01066
Type
XXX - Cert of Lawful Dev - DO NOT USE
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
Validated
7 Nov 1997
Target date
2 Jan 1998
Decision date
13 Feb 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 Feb 1998, delegated decision by Mike Thorp.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Nov 1997
Application validated
2 Jan 1998
Statutory target date
13 Feb 1998
Delegated decision: Approved · Mike Thorp
7 Nov 1997
Application validated
2 Jan 1998
Statutory target date
13 Feb 1998
Delegated decision: Approved · Mike Thorp

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.