Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Waltham Forest›…Endlebury wardE4 6PH19 Dale View Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 6PH›051644
Planning application · Waltham Forest

051644.

19 Dale View Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 6PH

Full / Other Planning at 19 Dale View Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 6PH, received 29 Jun 2005 — approved on 17 Aug 2005 (delegated, . Ms A Bernhart).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Approved
Outcome
17 Aug 2005
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single storey rear extension as shown on drawing number 2866/01 Revision A received on 29 June 2005.

Reference
051644
Type
Full Planning
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Jun 2005
Target date
24 Aug 2005
Decision date
17 Aug 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Reference
051644
Type
Full Planning
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Jun 2005
Target date
24 Aug 2005
Decision date
17 Aug 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 17 Aug 2005, delegated decision by . Ms A Bernhart — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Jun 2005
Application received
24 Aug 2005
Statutory target date
17 Aug 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · . Ms A Bernhart
29 Jun 2005
Application received
24 Aug 2005
Statutory target date
17 Aug 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · . Ms A Bernhart

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.