Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWaltham ForestChingford Green ward071222
Planning application · Waltham Forest

071222.

65 Yardley Lane, Chingford, London, E4 7RS

Full / Other Planning at 65 Yardley Lane, Chingford, London, E4 7RS, received 8 Oct 2007 — refused on 16 Nov 2020 (delegated, Rachel Jagger).

Waltham ForestChingford GreenE4 7RS071222
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Nov 2020
684 wks
Decision time
676 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of two storey side extension as shown by drawing number COM.SEP.07A received on 8th October 2007.

Reference
071222
Type
Full Planning
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E4 7RS
Received
8 Oct 2007
Target date
3 Dec 2007
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
071222
Type
Full Planning
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E4 7RS
Received
8 Oct 2007
Target date
3 Dec 2007
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Existing & Proposed Plans
22 Dec 2020
Location Site or Block Plan
22 Dec 2020
Application Form
22 Dec 2020
Existing & Proposed Plans
22 Dec 2020
Location Site or Block Plan
22 Dec 2020
Application Form
22 Dec 2020

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Nov 2020, delegated decision by Rachel Jagger — 684 weeks from submission (676 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Oct 2007
Application received
3 Dec 2007
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Rachel Jagger
8 Oct 2007
Application received
3 Dec 2007
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Rachel Jagger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.