Planning application · Waltham Forest
242673.
76 Mornington Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3DX
Householder at 76 Mornington Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3DX, received 31 Oct 2024 — refused on 12 Feb 2025 (delegated, Zara Raza).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Feb 2025
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a single storey rear extension and first floor rear extension.
Reference
242673
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E11 3DX
Ward
Council
Received
31 Oct 2024
Validated
19 Nov 2024
Target date
12 Feb 2025
Decision date
12 Feb 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
242673
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E11 3DX
Ward
Council
Received
31 Oct 2024
Validated
19 Nov 2024
Target date
12 Feb 2025
Decision date
12 Feb 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 9 rows
Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Feb 2025, delegated decision by Zara Raza — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
31 Oct 2024
Application received
19 Nov 2024
Application validated
12 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
12 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Zara Raza
31 Oct 2024
Application received
19 Nov 2024
Application validated
12 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Zara Raza
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The two-storey rear extension and single storey rear extension is inappropriate
by virtue of its scale in terms of height, width, bulk and massing resulting in an
overbearing, bulky and overly dominant addition that fails to respond appropriately
to the host property and local character. The development therefore fails to
comply with Policy 53 of the adopted Waltham Forest Local Plan LP1 (2024).
2
The proposed single storey rear extension by virtue of its height and depth
would be detrimental to the amenities of the adjoining occupiers on 78 Mornington
Road, by reason of overdominance, overshadowing, visual intrusion, loss of light
and loss of outlook. Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to Policy 57 of the
Waltham Forest Local Plan (2024).
1
The two-storey rear extension and single storey rear extension is inappropriate
by virtue of its scale in terms of height, width, bulk and massing resulting in an
overbearing, bulky and overly dominant addition that fails to respond appropriately
to the host property and local character. The development therefore fails to
comply with Policy 53 of the adopted Waltham Forest Local Plan LP1 (2024).
2
The proposed single storey rear extension by virtue of its height and depth
would be detrimental to the amenities of the adjoining occupiers on 78 Mornington
Road, by reason of overdominance, overshadowing, visual intrusion, loss of light
and loss of outlook. Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to Policy 57 of the
Waltham Forest Local Plan (2024).
Policies cited
Waltham Forest Local Plan 53Waltham Forest Local Plan 57
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.