Planning application · Waltham Forest
252301.
3 Percy Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 1AJ
Householder at 3 Percy Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 1AJ, received 29 Sep 2025 — refused on 25 Nov 2025 (delegated, Alishba Emanuel).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Nov 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a single storey rear infill extension and replacement windows to front and rear elevations on all levels.
Reference
252301
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Sep 2025
Validated
1 Oct 2025
Target date
26 Nov 2025
Decision date
25 Nov 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Reference
252301
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Sep 2025
Validated
1 Oct 2025
Target date
26 Nov 2025
Decision date
25 Nov 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 25 Nov 2025, delegated decision by Alishba Emanuel — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
29 Sep 2025
Application received
1 Oct 2025
Application validated
26 Nov 2025
Statutory target date
25 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Alishba Emanuel
29 Sep 2025
Application received
1 Oct 2025
Application validated
26 Nov 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Alishba Emanuel
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single-storey infill extension, by virtue of its excessive
height, bulk and poor design, would constitute an unsympathetic and visually
dominant form of development. The proposal within the rear aspect would appear
disproportionate and undermine the architectural hierarchy of the original dwelling.
As such, it would conflict with Policies 53 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan
(2024).
2
The proposed single-storey infill extension, by virtue of its excessive depth,
height, and close proximity to No.5 Percy Road, the development would result in
an unacceptable impact on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through
poor outlook, overshadowing, increased sense of enclosure, and an overbearing
visual presence. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 57 of the adopted
Waltham Forest Local Plan Part 1 (2024).
1
The proposed single-storey infill extension, by virtue of its excessive
height, bulk and poor design, would constitute an unsympathetic and visually
dominant form of development. The proposal within the rear aspect would appear
disproportionate and undermine the architectural hierarchy of the original dwelling.
As such, it would conflict with Policies 53 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan
(2024).
2
The proposed single-storey infill extension, by virtue of its excessive depth,
height, and close proximity to No.5 Percy Road, the development would result in
an unacceptable impact on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through
poor outlook, overshadowing, increased sense of enclosure, and an overbearing
visual presence. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 57 of the adopted
Waltham Forest Local Plan Part 1 (2024).
Policies cited
Waltham Forest Local Plan 53Waltham Forest Local Plan 57
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.