Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Waltham Forest›960766
Planning application · Waltham Forest

960766.

BT PAYPHONE OPPOSITE 483 TO 485 High Road Leytonstone

Full / Other Planning at BT PAYPHONE OPPOSITE 483 TO 485 High Road Leytonstone, received 10 Jul 1996 — approved on 1 Jan 2001 (delegated, Rachel Jagger).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Approved
Outcome
1 Jan 2001
234 wks
Decision time
226 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

INTSTALLATION OF TELEPHONE KIOSK

Reference
960766
Type
Full Planning
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
10 Jul 1996
Target date
4 Sep 1996
Decision date
1 Jan 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
960766
Type
Full Planning
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
10 Jul 1996
Target date
4 Sep 1996
Decision date
1 Jan 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 1 Jan 2001, delegated decision by Rachel Jagger — 234 weeks from submission (226 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
10 Jul 1996
Application received
4 Sep 1996
Statutory target date
1 Jan 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Jagger
10 Jul 1996
Application received
4 Sep 1996
Statutory target date
1 Jan 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Jagger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.