Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Waltham Forest›980762
Planning application · Waltham Forest

980762.

297 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8NU

Full / Other Planning at 297 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8NU, received 3 Feb 1998 — refused on 16 Nov 2020 (delegated, . Mrs C Kadiri).

Waltham Forest›E4 8NU›980762
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Nov 2020
1189 wks
Decision time
1181 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

CHANGE OF USE FROM RETAIL (A1) TO RESTAURANT (A3) ONLY CHANGE OF USE FROM RETAIL (A1) TO RESTAURANT (A3) ONLY

Reference
980762
Type
Full Planning
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E4 8NU
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
3 Feb 1998
Target date
31 Mar 1998
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
980762
Type
Full Planning
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E4 8NU
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
3 Feb 1998
Target date
31 Mar 1998
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Nov 2020, delegated decision by . Mrs C Kadiri — 1189 weeks from submission (1181 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Feb 1998
Application received
31 Mar 1998
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · . Mrs C Kadiri
3 Feb 1998
Application received
31 Mar 1998
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · . Mrs C Kadiri

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.