Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Waltham Forest›…E11 3NJ125 Cann Hall Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3NJ›981385
Planning application · Waltham Forest

981385.

125 Cann Hall Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3NJ

Full / Other Planning at 125 Cann Hall Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3NJ, received 9 Mar 1998 — approved on 16 Nov 2020 (delegated, Rachel Jagger).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Approved
Outcome
16 Nov 2020
1184 wks
Decision time
1176 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

ERECTION OF A SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION ERECTION OF A SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION

Reference
981385
Type
Full Planning
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
9 Mar 1998
Target date
4 May 1998
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Reference
981385
Type
Full Planning
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
9 Mar 1998
Target date
4 May 1998
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 16 Nov 2020, delegated decision by Rachel Jagger — 1184 weeks from submission (1176 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Mar 1998
Application received
4 May 1998
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Jagger
9 Mar 1998
Application received
4 May 1998
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Jagger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.