Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Waltham Forest›990870
Planning application · Waltham Forest

990870.

24 Epsom Road, Leyton, London, E10 6ES

Full / Other Planning at 24 Epsom Road, Leyton, London, E10 6ES, received 9 Jun 1999 — refused on 16 Nov 2020 (delegated, . Ms T McKenzie).

Waltham Forest›E10 6ES›990870
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Nov 2020
1119 wks
Decision time
1111 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of existing factory to 3 bedroom dwellinghouse.

Reference
990870
Type
Full Planning
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E10 6ES
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
9 Jun 1999
Validated
20 Jul 1999
Target date
14 Sep 1999
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
990870
Type
Full Planning
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E10 6ES
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
9 Jun 1999
Validated
20 Jul 1999
Target date
14 Sep 1999
Decision date
16 Nov 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Nov 2020, delegated decision by . Ms T McKenzie — 1119 weeks from submission (1111 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Jun 1999
Application received
20 Jul 1999
Application validated
14 Sep 1999
Statutory target date
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · . Ms T McKenzie
9 Jun 1999
Application received
20 Jul 1999
Application validated
14 Sep 1999
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Nov 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · . Ms T McKenzie

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.