Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWaltham ForestCann Hall wardE11 3LF82 Matcham Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3LF163292
Planning application · Waltham Forest

163292.

82 Matcham Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3LF

Householder at 82 Matcham Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3LF, received 8 Oct 2016 — approved on 9 Feb 2017 (delegated, Rachel Jagger).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Feb 2017
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of first floor rear extension including alterations to ground floor rear elevation.

Reference
163292
Type
Householder Planning
Case officer
Postcode
Received
8 Oct 2016
Validated
10 Oct 2016
Target date
10 Feb 2017
Decision date
9 Feb 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
163292
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Received
8 Oct 2016
Validated
10 Oct 2016
Target date
10 Feb 2017
Decision date
9 Feb 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Revised Floor Plan
Revised Elevation Plan
Block plan of the site
Application form - no personal data
Revised Floor Plan
Revised Elevation Plan
Block plan of the site
Show all 4 rows
Application form - no personal data

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Feb 2017, delegated decision by Rachel Jagger — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Oct 2016
Application received
10 Oct 2016
Application validated
10 Feb 2017
Statutory target date
9 Feb 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Jagger
8 Oct 2016
Application received
10 Oct 2016
Application validated
10 Feb 2017
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 Feb 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Jagger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.