Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWaltham ForestEndlebury wardE4 6PG132 Dale View Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 6PG200638
Planning application · Waltham Forest

200638.

132 Dale View Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 6PG

Householder at 132 Dale View Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 6PG, received 24 Feb 2020 — refused on 27 Apr 2020 (delegated, Oscar Orellana).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Apr 2020
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of new door to front of existing granny-annex at ground floor level.

Reference
200638
Type
Householder Planning
Case officer
Postcode
Received
24 Feb 2020
Validated
2 Mar 2020
Target date
27 Apr 2020
Decision date
27 Apr 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
200638
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Received
24 Feb 2020
Validated
2 Mar 2020
Target date
27 Apr 2020
Decision date
27 Apr 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Dec Gen Refuse Inf
22 Dec 2020
Revised Elevation Plan
22 Dec 2020
Application form - no personal data
22 Dec 2020
Dec Gen Refuse Inf
22 Dec 2020
Revised Elevation Plan
22 Dec 2020
Application form - no personal data
22 Dec 2020

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 Apr 2020, delegated decision by Oscar Orellana — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Feb 2020
Application received
2 Mar 2020
Application validated
27 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
27 Apr 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Oscar Orellana
24 Feb 2020
Application received
2 Mar 2020
Application validated
27 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Apr 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Oscar Orellana

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.