Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWaltham ForestLarkswood wardE4 9ES65 Brook Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 9ES251800
Planning application · Waltham Forest

251800.

65 Brook Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 9ES

Householder at 65 Brook Crescent, Chingford, London, E4 9ES, received 18 Jul 2025 — refused on 15 Sep 2025 (delegated, Kathy Lui).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWaltham Forest profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Sep 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Waltham Forest planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of gable roof extension over the existing bay window.

Reference
251800
Type
Householder Planning
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
18 Jul 2025
Validated
22 Jul 2025
Target date
16 Sep 2025
Decision date
15 Sep 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
251800
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
18 Jul 2025
Validated
22 Jul 2025
Target date
16 Sep 2025
Decision date
15 Sep 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Planning Decision Notice - General - Refuse (with Informativ
12 Sept 2025
Officer Report
12 Sept 2025
RES.pdf
22 Jul 2025
PLANNING-DOCUMENT-COMBINED-65-BROOK-CRESCENT-E4-9ES.pdf
22 Jul 2025
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN.pdf
21 Jul 2025
COMBINED DOCUMENT.pdf
21 Jul 2025
PROPOSED PLANS.pdf
21 Jul 2025
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN.pdf
21 Jul 2025
EXISTING PLANS.pdf
21 Jul 2025
LocationPlan.pdf
21 Jul 2025
Planning Decision Notice - General - Refuse (with Informativ
12 Sept 2025
Officer Report
12 Sept 2025
RES.pdf
22 Jul 2025
Show all 10 rows
PLANNING-DOCUMENT-COMBINED-65-BROOK-CRESCENT-E4-9ES.pdf
22 Jul 2025
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN.pdf
21 Jul 2025
COMBINED DOCUMENT.pdf
21 Jul 2025
PROPOSED PLANS.pdf
21 Jul 2025
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN.pdf
21 Jul 2025
EXISTING PLANS.pdf
21 Jul 2025
LocationPlan.pdf
21 Jul 2025

Documents open on the Waltham Forest portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Sep 2025, delegated decision by Kathy Lui — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Jul 2025
Application received
22 Jul 2025
Application validated
16 Sep 2025
Statutory target date
15 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kathy Lui
18 Jul 2025
Application received
22 Jul 2025
Application validated
16 Sep 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
15 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kathy Lui

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Reason(s) 1.The proposed gable roof extension extending from the existing roof above the existing bay window of the host property is unacceptable, due to its overall appearance and design which would be an alien and obstructive feature within the existing streetscape and rooflines, out of keeping with the established architectual character within its setting in the relevant terrace parade and general streetscene, whereby setting an undesireable precedent for future developments within this immediate locality. As such, the proposal fails to comply with Policy 53 of the adopted Waltham Forest Local Plan Part 1 (2024).
1
Reason(s) 1.The proposed gable roof extension extending from the existing roof above the existing bay window of the host property is unacceptable, due to its overall appearance and design which would be an alien and obstructive feature within the existing streetscape and rooflines, out of keeping with the established architectual character within its setting in the relevant terrace parade and general streetscene, whereby setting an undesireable precedent for future developments within this immediate locality. As such, the proposal fails to comply with Policy 53 of the adopted Waltham Forest Local Plan Part 1 (2024).
Policies cited
Waltham Forest Local Plan 53

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.