Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWandsworthEast Putney - Historic ward2004/3451
Planning application · Wandsworth

2004/3451.

30 Putney Hill SW15

Full / Other Planning at 30 Putney Hill SW15, received 18 Aug 2004 — refused on 24 Sep 2004 (delegated, Matthew Payne 6247).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Sep 2004
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Raise ridge height of roof by 800mm, alter from hipped to gable end and installation of three dormer windows in rear roofslope for loft conversion.

Reference
2004/3451
Type
Application for Full Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
18 Aug 2004
Decision date
24 Sep 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Reference
2004/3451
Type
Application for Full Permission
Show all 13 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
18 Aug 2004
Decision date
24 Sep 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
Decision Notice
Drawing
Report
Application Form
Decision Notice
Drawing
Show all 4 rows
Report

Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Sep 2004, delegated decision by Matthew Payne 6247 — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Aug 2004
Application received
24 Sep 2004
Delegated decision: Refused · Matthew Payne 6247
18 Aug 2004
Application received
24 Sep 2004
Delegated decision: Refused · Matthew Payne 6247

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.