Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Wandsworth›…Nightingale - Historic ward91 Nightingale Lane SW12›2005/4541
Planning application · Wandsworth

2005/4541.

91 Nightingale Lane SW12

Full / Other Planning at 91 Nightingale Lane SW12, received 28 Oct 2005 — approved on 19 Dec 2005 (delegated, Julie Thomas 8416).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Approved
Outcome
19 Dec 2005
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use of ground and basement floors from shop (Class A1) to a beauty salon.

Reference
2005/4541
Type
Application for Full Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
28 Oct 2005
Decision date
19 Dec 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2005/4541
Type
Application for Full Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
28 Oct 2005
Decision date
19 Dec 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Drawing
—
Report
—
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Drawing
—
Show all 4 rows
Report
—

Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 19 Dec 2005, delegated decision by Julie Thomas 8416 — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Oct 2005
Application received
19 Dec 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · Julie Thomas 8416
28 Oct 2005
Application received
19 Dec 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · Julie Thomas 8416

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.