Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Wandsworth›…Thamesfield - Historic wardSW15 6TL332 Upper Richmond Road SW15 6TL›2009/0823
Planning application · Wandsworth

2009/0823.

332 Upper Richmond Road SW15 6TL

Trees at 332 Upper Richmond Road SW15 6TL, received 1 Apr 2009 — approved on 1 Apr 2009 (delegated, Evelyn O'Neill).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Approved
Outcome
1 Apr 2009
0 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

G1 Limes x8 (front garden): Reduce to previous points. T1 Beech (front garden): Crown thin by 25%. T2 Holm Oak & T3 Beech (friont garden): Reduce crowns by 25%.

Reference
2009/0823
Type
Work to trees in conservation area
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Apr 2009
Decision date
1 Apr 2009
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2009/0823
Type
Work to trees in conservation area
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Apr 2009
Decision date
1 Apr 2009
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Drawing
—
Revised Drawing
—
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Drawing
—
Show all 4 rows
Revised Drawing
—

Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 1 Apr 2009, delegated decision by Evelyn O'Neill — 0 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Apr 2009
Application received
1 Apr 2009
Delegated decision: Approved · Evelyn O'Neill
1 Apr 2009
Application received
1 Apr 2009
Delegated decision: Approved · Evelyn O'Neill

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.