Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Wandsworth›…West Putney - Historic wardSW15 6HL1 St Margarets Crescent SW15 6HL›2018/5924
Planning application · Wandsworth

2018/5924.

1 St Margarets Crescent SW15 6HL

Trees at 1 St Margarets Crescent SW15 6HL, received 19 Dec 2018 — approved on 3 Jan 2019 (delegated, Elizabeth Doty).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Approved
Outcome
3 Jan 2019
2 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Front Garden: T1 Prunus - Crown reduce to previous pruning points, removing approx 3m. Rear Garden: T2 Ash - Pollard to previous pruning points, removing up to approx 5m. T3 Lime - Pollard to previous pruning points, removing up to approx 5m.

Reference
2018/5924
Type
Work to trees in conservation area
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
19 Dec 2018
Decision date
3 Jan 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2018/5924
Type
Work to trees in conservation area
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
19 Dec 2018
Decision date
3 Jan 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 3 Jan 2019, delegated decision by Elizabeth Doty — 2 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Dec 2018
Application received
3 Jan 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Elizabeth Doty
19 Dec 2018
Application received
3 Jan 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Elizabeth Doty

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.