Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Wandsworth›…Thamesfield - Historic wardSW15 6TL332 Upper Richmond Road SW15 6TL›2019/0884
Planning application · Wandsworth

2019/0884.

332 Upper Richmond Road SW15 6TL

Trees at 332 Upper Richmond Road SW15 6TL, received 1 Mar 2019 — approved on 5 Mar 2019 (delegated, Elizabeth Doty).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Mar 2019
1 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Front Garden: T1 Holm Oak - Crown lift to give 3m clearance from ground level above public footpath and 5m clearance from ground level above public highway. T2 Beech - Prune to give 2m clearance from adjacent properties; target prune stubs and remove any dead/dying branches.

Reference
2019/0884
Type
Work to trees in conservation area
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Mar 2019
Decision date
5 Mar 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2019/0884
Type
Work to trees in conservation area
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Mar 2019
Decision date
5 Mar 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Drawing
—
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Drawing
—

Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 5 Mar 2019, delegated decision by Elizabeth Doty — 1 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Mar 2019
Application received
5 Mar 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Elizabeth Doty
1 Mar 2019
Application received
5 Mar 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Elizabeth Doty

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.