Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWandsworthNightingale - Historic ward2020/2604
Planning application · Wandsworth

2020/2604.

182 Balham High Road SW12 9BW

Full / Other Planning at 182 Balham High Road SW12 9BW, received 30 Jul 2020 — refused on 14 Sep 2020 (delegated, Wendy Melaab).

WandsworthNightingale - HistoricSW12 9BW2020/2604
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Sep 2020
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Details of Construction Management Plan pursuant to condition 12 of planning permission dated 10/07/2015 ref 2015/1205 (Part demolition of existing building and erection of a 4-storey building accommodating retail (A1 use class) at ground floor and basement level, and 5 self-contained residential units (C3 use class) (3 x 1 bed, 2 x 2 bed) above, together with associated alterations).

Reference
2020/2604
Type
Details (following full perm.)
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW12 9BW
Council
Received
30 Jul 2020
Decision date
14 Sep 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Reference
2020/2604
Type
Details (following full perm.)
Show all 14 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW12 9BW
Council
Received
30 Jul 2020
Decision date
14 Sep 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
Committee Report
Decision Notice
Drawing
Report
Application Form
Committee Report
Decision Notice
Show all 5 rows
Drawing
Report

Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Sep 2020, delegated decision by Wendy Melaab — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Jul 2020
Application received
14 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Wendy Melaab
30 Jul 2020
Application received
14 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Wendy Melaab

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The submitted information fails to comply with TfL's latest guidance on Construction Logistics Plans. The condition requiring the submission of a CMP was made in the interests of traffic, general amenity of the area and neighbour amenity in accordance with Council policies DMT1 and DMT5. The submission fails to accord to with the requirements of condition 12. Director of Environment and Community Services: Paul Chadwick
1
The submitted information fails to comply with TfL's latest guidance on Construction Logistics Plans. The condition requiring the submission of a CMP was made in the interests of traffic, general amenity of the area and neighbour amenity in accordance with Council policies DMT1 and DMT5. The submission fails to accord to with the requirements of condition 12. Director of Environment and Community Services: Paul Chadwick

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.