Planning application · Wandsworth
2021/4916.
Kennel Lodge 55 Roehampton High Street SW15 4HH
Householder at Kennel Lodge 55 Roehampton High Street SW15 4HH, received 24 Nov 2021 — refused on 12 Jan 2022 (delegated, Ben Hayter).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWandsworth profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Jan 2022
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Wandsworth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Alterations including erection of first floor front/side extension.
Reference
2021/4916
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
24 Nov 2021
Decision date
12 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2021/4916
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
24 Nov 2021
Decision date
12 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Wandsworth portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Jan 2022, delegated decision by Ben Hayter — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
24 Nov 2021
Application received
12 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Hayter
24 Nov 2021
Application received
12 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Hayter
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension by reason of its scale, form and siting would be an
inappropriate and incongruous addition that would cause undue harm to the
character and appearance of the application site, the streetscene and the
heritage significance of the conservation area. The proposed development
would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the
conservation area, with no public benefit outlined that it is considered would be
sufficient to outweigh this harm, contrary to Section 72(1) of the Planning
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, the NPPF, polices DMS1,
DMS2 and DMH5 of the DMPD and policy HC1 of the London Plan.
In dealing with this application the Council has implemented the requirement in the
National Planning Policy Framework to work with the applicant in a positive and
proactive manner and the Council has, as far as practicable, sought solutions to
problems arising in relation to dealing with the planning application. We have made
Director of Environment and Community Services: Paul Chadwick
available detailed advice in the form of our statutory policies in the Local Plan
consisting of the Core Strategy, Development Management Policies Document,
Supplementary Planning documents and where appropriate the Site Specific
Allocations Document as well as offering a full pre application advice service. However,
we have been unable to seek solutions to problems as the principle of the proposal is
clearly contrary to our statutory policies and negotiation could not overcome the
reasons for refusal.
Jenifer Jackson
Assistant Director (Planning and Transport)
WANDSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL
ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTORATE
GENERAL INFORMATION
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
This decision does not convey any approval, consent, permission or licence under any other Acts, or Bye-Laws, Orders or
Regulations and nothing in this decision shall be regarded as compliance with or approval, consent, permission or licence
under other legislation.
You must ensure that your proposal complies with the Building Regulations. You can obtain advice from Building Control,
between 09:00 and 13:00 Monday to Friday at the Town Hall Extension, Wandsworth High Street, SW18 2PU and via telephone
on no. 020 8871 7620.
You are also reminded that the Council’s permission does not modify or affect any personal or restrictive covenants
easements, etc., applying to or affecting the land or the rights of any persons (including the Council) entitled to the benefits of
them. If you are unsure whether there are relevant restrictions which might stop the building of extensions, alterations to the
property or changing the use (even if you have a planning permission) you should consult a suitably qualified professional
advisor.
If the proposed development requires changes to, or new street name or numbers you should contact the Council’s Street Name and
Numbering Section at the earliest opportunity (Tel No. 020 8871 7520).
Statement of Applicant’s Rights arising from the refusal of planning permission or from the grant of permission subject to
conditions.
1
The proposed extension by reason of its scale, form and siting would be an
inappropriate and incongruous addition that would cause undue harm to the
character and appearance of the application site, the streetscene and the
heritage significance of the conservation area. The proposed development
would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the
conservation area, with no public benefit outlined that it is considered would be
sufficient to outweigh this harm, contrary to Section 72(1) of the Planning
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, the NPPF, polices DMS1,
DMS2 and DMH5 of the DMPD and policy HC1 of the London Plan.
In dealing with this application the Council has implemented the requirement in the
National Planning Policy Framework to work with the applicant in a positive and
proactive manner and the Council has, as far as practicable, sought solutions to
problems arising in relation to dealing with the planning application. We have made
Director of Environment and Community Services: Paul Chadwick
available detailed advice in the form of our statutory policies in the Local Plan
consisting of the Core Strategy, Development Management Policies Document,
Supplementary Planning documents and where appropriate the Site Specific
Allocations Document as well as offering a full pre application advice service. However,
we have been unable to seek solutions to problems as the principle of the proposal is
clearly contrary to our statutory policies and negotiation could not overcome the
reasons for refusal.
Jenifer Jackson
Assistant Director (Planning and Transport)
WANDSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL
ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTORATE
GENERAL INFORMATION
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
This decision does not convey any approval, consent, permission or licence under any other Acts, or Bye-Laws, Orders or
Regulations and nothing in this decision shall be regarded as compliance with or approval, consent, permission or licence
under other legislation.
You must ensure that your proposal complies with the Building Regulations. You can obtain advice from Building Control,
between 09:00 and 13:00 Monday to Friday at the Town Hall Extension, Wandsworth High Street, SW18 2PU and via telephone
on no. 020 8871 7620.
You are also reminded that the Council’s permission does not modify or affect any personal or restrictive covenants
easements, etc., applying to or affecting the land or the rights of any persons (including the Council) entitled to the benefits of
them. If you are unsure whether there are relevant restrictions which might stop the building of extensions, alterations to the
property or changing the use (even if you have a planning permission) you should consult a suitably qualified professional
advisor.
If the proposed development requires changes to, or new street name or numbers you should contact the Council’s Street Name and
Numbering Section at the earliest opportunity (Tel No. 020 8871 7520).
Statement of Applicant’s Rights arising from the refusal of planning permission or from the grant of permission subject to
conditions.
Policies cited
DMS1DMS2DMH5NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.