Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterLittle Venice wardW9 1SS20/01638/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

20/01638/FULL.

14 Clifton Road London W9 1SS

Full / Other Planning at 14 Clifton Road London W9 1SS, received 5 Mar 2020 — refused on 19 Mar 2021 (delegated, Frederica Cooney).

WestminsterLittle VeniceW9 1SS20/01638/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Mar 2021
54 wks
Decision time
46 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
26
Documents
26 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of 4 condensing units on the external wall above rear single storey seating area and the proposed erection of acoustic screen. (part retrospective application)

Reference
20/01638/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
5 Mar 2020
Validated
6 Apr 2020
Target date
1 Jun 2020
Decision date
19 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
20/01638/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
5 Mar 2020
Validated
6 Apr 2020
Target date
1 Jun 2020
Decision date
19 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
19 Mar 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
19 Mar 2021
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION/SECTION
1 Sept 2020
TECHNICAL REPORT
1 Sept 2020
ENCLOSURE SKETCH
1 Sept 2020
PHOTO EXAMPLE
1 Sept 2020
KEVIN MUTIMER
4 May 2020
OBJECTION
27 Apr 2020
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
8 Apr 2020
SITE NOTICE 21 OR 28 DAYS IF T&C APPL.
8 Apr 2020
DELEGATED REPORT
19 Mar 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
19 Mar 2021
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION/SECTION
1 Sept 2020
Show all 10 rows
TECHNICAL REPORT
1 Sept 2020
ENCLOSURE SKETCH
1 Sept 2020
PHOTO EXAMPLE
1 Sept 2020
KEVIN MUTIMER
4 May 2020
OBJECTION
27 Apr 2020
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
8 Apr 2020
SITE NOTICE 21 OR 28 DAYS IF T&C APPL.
8 Apr 2020

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 19 Mar 2021, delegated decision by Frederica Cooney — 54 weeks from submission (46 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Mar 2020
Application received
6 Apr 2020
Application validated
1 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
19 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Frederica Cooney
5 Mar 2020
Application received
6 Apr 2020
Application validated
1 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Frederica Cooney

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Insufficient details have been submitted to allow the City Council to assess the noise impact of the air conditioning plant and the proposed acoustic enclosure . This means that the plant could cause a noise nuisance to the people living in neighbouring properties. This would not meet policies S29 and S32 of Westminster's City Plan (November 2016) and ENV 5 and ENV 6 of our Unitary Development Plan that we adopted in January 2007.
2
Because of the detailed design and size, the acoustic enclosure would harm the appearance of this building and this part of the City. This would not meet policies S25 and S28 of Westminster's City Plan (November 2016) and DES 1, DES 5 and DES 9 of our Unitary Development Plan that we adopted in January 2007. (X16BC)
1
Insufficient details have been submitted to allow the City Council to assess the noise impact of the air conditioning plant and the proposed acoustic enclosure . This means that the plant could cause a noise nuisance to the people living in neighbouring properties. This would not meet policies S29 and S32 of Westminster's City Plan (November 2016) and ENV 5 and ENV 6 of our Unitary Development Plan that we adopted in January 2007.
2
Because of the detailed design and size, the acoustic enclosure would harm the appearance of this building and this part of the City. This would not meet policies S25 and S28 of Westminster's City Plan (November 2016) and DES 1, DES 5 and DES 9 of our Unitary Development Plan that we adopted in January 2007. (X16BC)
Policies cited
S29S32ENV5ENV6S25S28DES1DES5DES9

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.