Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterLittle Venice ward21/00288/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

21/00288/FULL.

79A Warwick Avenue London W9 2PP

Full / Other Planning at 79A Warwick Avenue London W9 2PP, received 19 Jan 2021 — refused on 15 Apr 2021 (delegated, Sarah Whitnall).

WestminsterLittle VeniceW9 2PP21/00288/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Apr 2021
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single storey detached garden office to the rear garden.

Reference
21/00288/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W9 2PP
Received
19 Jan 2021
Validated
20 Jan 2021
Target date
17 Mar 2021
Decision date
15 Apr 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/00288/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W9 2PP
Received
19 Jan 2021
Validated
20 Jan 2021
Target date
17 Mar 2021
Decision date
15 Apr 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
15 Apr 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
15 Apr 2021
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
15 Mar 2021
SITE NOTICE 21 OR 28 DAYS IF T&C APPL.
15 Mar 2021
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
15 Mar 2021
EXISTING DRAWINGS
20 Jan 2021
PROPOSED DRAWINGS WITH SCALEBAR
20 Jan 2021
LOCATION_PLAN-3859145
19 Jan 2021
BLOCK_PLAN-3859140
19 Jan 2021
ATTACHMENTSUMMARY
19 Jan 2021
DELEGATED REPORT
15 Apr 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
15 Apr 2021
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
15 Mar 2021
Show all 10 rows
SITE NOTICE 21 OR 28 DAYS IF T&C APPL.
15 Mar 2021
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
15 Mar 2021
EXISTING DRAWINGS
20 Jan 2021
PROPOSED DRAWINGS WITH SCALEBAR
20 Jan 2021
LOCATION_PLAN-3859145
19 Jan 2021
BLOCK_PLAN-3859140
19 Jan 2021
ATTACHMENTSUMMARY
19 Jan 2021

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Apr 2021, delegated decision by Sarah Whitnall — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Jan 2021
Application received
20 Jan 2021
Application validated
17 Mar 2021
Statutory target date
15 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Whitnall
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
19 Jan 2021
Application received
20 Jan 2021
Application validated
17 Mar 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
15 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Whitnall
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of its location, scale and detailed design the detached garden building would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Maida Vale Conservation Area. This would not meet S25 and S28 of Westminster's City Plan (November 2016) and DES 1, DES 5, DES 9, DES 12 and paras 10.108 to 10.128 of our Unitary Development Plan that we adopted in January 2007 and Policies 38, 39, 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040: Intend to Adopt version. (X16AD)
1
Because of its location, scale and detailed design the detached garden building would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Maida Vale Conservation Area. This would not meet S25 and S28 of Westminster's City Plan (November 2016) and DES 1, DES 5, DES 9, DES 12 and paras 10.108 to 10.128 of our Unitary Development Plan that we adopted in January 2007 and Policies 38, 39, 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040: Intend to Adopt version. (X16AD)
Policies cited
S25S28our Unitary Development Plan 10.128City Plan 38City Plan 39City Plan 40

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.