Planning application · Westminster
21/02272/LBC.
44 Westminster Palace Gardens Artillery Row London SW1P 1RR
Listed Building at 44 Westminster Palace Gardens Artillery Row London SW1P 1RR, received 7 Apr 2021 — refused on 28 May 2021 (delegated, Allison Borden).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 May 2021
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Refurbishment and modernisation to the interior layout and associated works.
Reference
21/02272/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW1P 1RR
Ward
Council
Received
7 Apr 2021
Target date
2 Jun 2021
Decision date
28 May 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/02272/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW1P 1RR
Ward
Council
Received
7 Apr 2021
Target date
2 Jun 2021
Decision date
28 May 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 28 May 2021, delegated decision by Allison Borden — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
7 Apr 2021
Application received
2 Jun 2021
Statutory target date
28 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Allison Borden
7 Apr 2021
Application received
2 Jun 2021
Statutory target date
28 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Allison Borden
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of the loss of historic features the proposals would harm the architectural and
historic interest of this grade II listed building. This would be against the advice set out in
Policy 39 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021) and the advice set out in our
'Supplementary Planning Guidance: Repairs and Alterations to Listed Buildings'. (X18AD)
2
Because of the loss of plan form and proportions, the sudivision of 'bedroom 1' and
associated alterations, would harm the architectural and historic interest of this grade II listed
building. This would be against the advice set out in Policy 39 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040
(April 2021) and the advice set out in our 'Supplementary Planning Guidance: Repairs and
Alterations to Listed Buildings'. (X18AD)
1
Because of the loss of historic features the proposals would harm the architectural and
historic interest of this grade II listed building. This would be against the advice set out in
Policy 39 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021) and the advice set out in our
'Supplementary Planning Guidance: Repairs and Alterations to Listed Buildings'. (X18AD)
2
Because of the loss of plan form and proportions, the sudivision of 'bedroom 1' and
associated alterations, would harm the architectural and historic interest of this grade II listed
building. This would be against the advice set out in Policy 39 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040
(April 2021) and the advice set out in our 'Supplementary Planning Guidance: Repairs and
Alterations to Listed Buildings'. (X18AD)
Policies cited
City Plan 39
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.