Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterRegent's Park ward21/03125/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

21/03125/FULL.

Development Site At 28-32 Wellington Road London

Full / Other Planning at Development Site At 28-32 Wellington Road London, received 12 May 2021 — refused on 7 Jul 2021 (delegated, Kimberley Davies).

WestminsterRegent's Park21/03125/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Jul 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of Condition 20 of planning permission dated 01.04.2021(RN: 20/06164/FULL which in itself varied earlier permissions, 18/10420/FULL; 18/01721/FULL; 15/08352/FULL for the Demolition of existing building and erection of a new six storey, plus basement building with frontages to Wellington Road and Cochrane Street to provide 36 units for a dual/ alternative use as residential flats (Class C3) or serviced apartments (Sui Generis), with car and cycle parking at basement level and new landscaping. Namely, to omit the green/ brown roofs and enhance landscaping at ground level.

Reference
21/03125/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
12 May 2021
Target date
7 Jul 2021
Decision date
7 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/03125/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
12 May 2021
Target date
7 Jul 2021
Decision date
7 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
7 Jul 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
7 Jul 2021
ARBORICULTURAL COMMENTS
22 Jun 2021
PLANNING@ ST JOHNS WOOD SOCIETY
7 Jun 2021
ACK-GENERAL LETTER (G/P/C)
19 May 2021
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
19 May 2021
CNSLT-WARD COUNCILLORS
19 May 2021
CNSLT-WARD COUNCILLORS
19 May 2021
ECNSLT-INTERNAL CONSULTS
19 May 2021
CNSLT-WARD COUNCILLORS
19 May 2021
DELEGATED REPORT
7 Jul 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
7 Jul 2021
ARBORICULTURAL COMMENTS
22 Jun 2021
Show all 10 rows
PLANNING@ ST JOHNS WOOD SOCIETY
7 Jun 2021
ACK-GENERAL LETTER (G/P/C)
19 May 2021
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
19 May 2021
CNSLT-WARD COUNCILLORS
19 May 2021
CNSLT-WARD COUNCILLORS
19 May 2021
ECNSLT-INTERNAL CONSULTS
19 May 2021
CNSLT-WARD COUNCILLORS
19 May 2021

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 Jul 2021, delegated decision by Kimberley Davies — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
12 May 2021
Application received
7 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
7 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kimberley Davies
12 May 2021
Application received
7 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
7 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kimberley Davies

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
It is has not been sufficiently demonstrated that a green and/ or brown roof can not be accommodated at roof level of this redevelopment and therefore the loss of the requirement to provide a green and or brown sedum roof would be contrary to Policy 34 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021).
1
It is has not been sufficiently demonstrated that a green and/ or brown roof can not be accommodated at roof level of this redevelopment and therefore the loss of the requirement to provide a green and or brown sedum roof would be contrary to Policy 34 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021).
Policies cited
City Plan 34

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.