Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterHyde Park ward21/04624/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

21/04624/FULL.

Lillian Penson Hall 15-25 Talbot Square London W2 1TT

Full / Other Planning at Lillian Penson Hall 15-25 Talbot Square London W2 1TT, received 8 Jul 2021 — refused on 6 Jan 2022 (delegated, Alistair Taylor).

WestminsterHyde ParkW2 1TT21/04624/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
6 Jan 2022
26 wks
Decision time
18 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
28
Documents
28 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of a telecommunications base station for Telefonica UK Ltd (O2) and Vodafone Ltd, for temporary period of 6 years comprising 6 no. antennas, 3 no. 300mm diameter dish antennas and 1 no. 600mm diameter dish antenna mounted on 3 no. support poles, within a Glass-reinforced plastic (GRP) enclosure, associated 6 no. equipment cabinets sited on a grillage on the centre of the rooftop and ancillary works

Reference
21/04624/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W2 1TT
Received
8 Jul 2021
Target date
2 Sep 2021
Decision date
6 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/04624/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W2 1TT
Received
8 Jul 2021
Target date
2 Sep 2021
Decision date
6 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
6 Jan 2022
DELEGATED REPORT
6 Jan 2022
COVERAGE PLOTS
30 Sept 2021
VODAFONE COVERAGE PLOTS
30 Sept 2021
OBJECTION
2 Sept 2021
OBJECTION COMMENT
20 Aug 2021
HISTORIC ENGLAND
12 Aug 2021
CNSLT-CONSULTEE CLOUD STD
10 Aug 2021
CORNERSTONE 15115320 INDUSTRY SITE SPECIFIC SUPPLEMENTARY IN
3 Aug 2021
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
14 Jul 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
6 Jan 2022
DELEGATED REPORT
6 Jan 2022
COVERAGE PLOTS
30 Sept 2021
Show all 10 rows
VODAFONE COVERAGE PLOTS
30 Sept 2021
OBJECTION
2 Sept 2021
OBJECTION COMMENT
20 Aug 2021
HISTORIC ENGLAND
12 Aug 2021
CNSLT-CONSULTEE CLOUD STD
10 Aug 2021
CORNERSTONE 15115320 INDUSTRY SITE SPECIFIC SUPPLEMENTARY IN
3 Aug 2021
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
14 Jul 2021

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 6 Jan 2022, delegated decision by Alistair Taylor — 26 weeks from submission (18 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Jul 2021
Application received
2 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
6 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Alistair Taylor
8 Jul 2021
Application received
2 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
6 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Alistair Taylor

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of their size, design and location, the telecommunications equipment with GRP shrouding would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area, and would harm the setting of surrounding listed buildings. This would not meet Policies 19, 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021). (X16AD)
1
Because of their size, design and location, the telecommunications equipment with GRP shrouding would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area, and would harm the setting of surrounding listed buildings. This would not meet Policies 19, 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021). (X16AD)
Policies cited
City Plan 19City Plan 38City Plan 39City Plan 40

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.