Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterHyde Park ward21/07553/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

21/07553/FULL.

26 Hyde Park Street London W2 2JN

Full / Other Planning at 26 Hyde Park Street London W2 2JN, received 3 Nov 2021 — refused on 20 Dec 2021 (delegated, Christina Sriramula).

WestminsterHyde ParkW2 2JN21/07553/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Dec 2021
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey part glazed part solid rear extension on second floor rear terrace; installation of lantern roof light to main roof level.

Reference
21/07553/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Agent / consultant
Postcode
W2 2JN
Received
3 Nov 2021
Validated
15 Nov 2021
Target date
10 Jan 2022
Decision date
20 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/07553/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Postcode
W2 2JN
Received
3 Nov 2021
Validated
15 Nov 2021
Target date
10 Jan 2022
Decision date
20 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
20 Dec 2021
DELEGATED REPORT
20 Dec 2021
PROPOSED REAR EXTENSION
15 Nov 2021
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
15 Nov 2021
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
15 Nov 2021
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
15 Nov 2021
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
10 Nov 2021
1ST INVALID LETTER
10 Nov 2021
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS & LOCATION PLAN
3 Nov 2021
DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT
3 Nov 2021
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
20 Dec 2021
DELEGATED REPORT
20 Dec 2021
PROPOSED REAR EXTENSION
15 Nov 2021
Show all 10 rows
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
15 Nov 2021
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
15 Nov 2021
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
15 Nov 2021
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
10 Nov 2021
1ST INVALID LETTER
10 Nov 2021
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS & LOCATION PLAN
3 Nov 2021
DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT
3 Nov 2021

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Dec 2021, delegated decision by Christina Sriramula — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Nov 2021
Application received
15 Nov 2021
Application validated
10 Jan 2022
Statutory target date
20 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Christina Sriramula
3 Nov 2021
Application received
15 Nov 2021
Application validated
10 Jan 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Christina Sriramula

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of its design, size and location, the extension would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021). (X16AD) Note: TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 Applicant's Rights and General Information 1.
1
Because of its design, size and location, the extension would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021). (X16AD) Note: TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 Applicant's Rights and General Information 1.
Policies cited
City Plan 38City Plan 39City Plan 40

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.