Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterLancaster Gate wardW2 3DAFinn Court 28 Gloucester Terrace London W2 3DA23/08147/LBC
Planning application · Westminster

23/08147/LBC.

Finn Court 28 Gloucester Terrace London W2 3DA

Listed Building at Finn Court 28 Gloucester Terrace London W2 3DA, received 23 Nov 2023 — refused on 22 Aug 2024 (delegated, Richard Langston).

WestminsterLancaster GateW2 3DA23/08147/LBC
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Aug 2024
39 wks
Decision time
31 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of a extract ducting within the lightwell at basement level, in association with the installation of internal air conditioning unit at the Crescent Hotel within the basement level. (Retrospective Application, Linked with 23/08146/FULL)

Reference
23/08147/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
23 Nov 2023
Validated
29 Dec 2023
Target date
23 Feb 2024
Decision date
22 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
23/08147/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent Application
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
23 Nov 2023
Validated
29 Dec 2023
Target date
23 Feb 2024
Decision date
22 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSAL-LISTED BUILDING CONSENT [PE]
22 Aug 2024
DELEGATED REPORT
22 Aug 2024
ECNSLT-INTERNAL CONSULTS
9 Jan 2024
ACK-GENERAL LETTER (G/P/C)
9 Jan 2024
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
4 Dec 2023
28 GLOUCESTER TERRACE - LOCATION PLAN
23 Nov 2023
PLANNING COMPLIANCE REPORT
23 Nov 2023
FLOOR PLANS
23 Nov 2023
SITE PLAN
23 Nov 2023
EAST ELEVATIONS
23 Nov 2023
REFUSAL-LISTED BUILDING CONSENT [PE]
22 Aug 2024
DELEGATED REPORT
22 Aug 2024
ECNSLT-INTERNAL CONSULTS
9 Jan 2024
Show all 10 rows
ACK-GENERAL LETTER (G/P/C)
9 Jan 2024
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
4 Dec 2023
28 GLOUCESTER TERRACE - LOCATION PLAN
23 Nov 2023
PLANNING COMPLIANCE REPORT
23 Nov 2023
FLOOR PLANS
23 Nov 2023
SITE PLAN
23 Nov 2023
EAST ELEVATIONS
23 Nov 2023

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 22 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Richard Langston — 39 weeks from submission (31 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Nov 2023
Application received
29 Dec 2023
Application validated
23 Feb 2024
Statutory target date
22 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Richard Langston
23 Nov 2023
Application received
29 Dec 2023
Application validated
23 Feb 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Richard Langston

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of its functional appearance and prominent location in the front lightwell (and the detailed design of basement door), the duct works would harm the appearance and setting of this grade II listed building. It would also fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021).
1
Because of its functional appearance and prominent location in the front lightwell (and the detailed design of basement door), the duct works would harm the appearance and setting of this grade II listed building. It would also fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021).
Policies cited
City Plan 38City Plan 39City Plan 40

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.