Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Removal of existing glazed extension and construction of two storey timber glazed extension with brickwork to flank wall at lower ground and ground floor level, extension of existing lower ground floor rear extension, timber screening above existing boundary walls and metal staircase and balustrade, Including minor internal alterations. (Linked with 24/07911/FULL)
Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Apr 2025, delegated decision by Charles Cooksley — 21 weeks from submission (13 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
13 Nov 2024
Application received
9 Dec 2024
Application validated
3 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
10 Apr 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Charles Cooksley
13 Nov 2024
Application received
9 Dec 2024
Application validated
3 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
10 Apr 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Charles Cooksley
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Your drawings do not include enough details of 130cm rear extension near the side boundary
with no. 68 for us to assess how your plans would affect the building and the Belgravia
Conservation Area.
We believe that the work could fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character
and appearance of the building and the conservation area. This would not meet Policies 38
and 39 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021) and the advice set out in our 'Supplementary
Planning Guidance: Development and Demolition in Conservation Areas'. (X22AE)
2
Because of its bulk, dominance and associated boundary wall extension the proposed two
storey rear extension would harm the architectural and historic interest of this grade II listed
building. It would also fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and
appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 38, 39 and 40
of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021). (X17CD)
Note:
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990
Applicant's Rights and General Information
1.
1
Your drawings do not include enough details of 130cm rear extension near the side boundary
with no. 68 for us to assess how your plans would affect the building and the Belgravia
Conservation Area.
We believe that the work could fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character
and appearance of the building and the conservation area. This would not meet Policies 38
and 39 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021) and the advice set out in our 'Supplementary
Planning Guidance: Development and Demolition in Conservation Areas'. (X22AE)
2
Because of its bulk, dominance and associated boundary wall extension the proposed two
storey rear extension would harm the architectural and historic interest of this grade II listed
building. It would also fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and
appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 38, 39 and 40
of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021). (X17CD)
Note:
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990
Applicant's Rights and General Information
1.
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.