Planning application · Westminster
25/02155/LBC.
101 Fifth Avenue London W10 4DR
Listed Building at 101 Fifth Avenue London W10 4DR, received 31 Mar 2025 — refused on 3 Jun 2025 (delegated, John Wilman).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Jun 2025
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of replacement windows to front elevation at first and ground floor levels with double glazed timber windows (Retrospective). (Linked with 25/02154/FULL)
Reference
25/02155/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W10 4DR
Ward
Council
Received
31 Mar 2025
Validated
14 Apr 2025
Target date
9 Jun 2025
Decision date
3 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
25/02155/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W10 4DR
Ward
Council
Received
31 Mar 2025
Validated
14 Apr 2025
Target date
9 Jun 2025
Decision date
3 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 3 Jun 2025, delegated decision by John Wilman — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
31 Mar 2025
Application received
14 Apr 2025
Application validated
9 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
3 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · John Wilman
31 Mar 2025
Application received
14 Apr 2025
Application validated
9 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · John Wilman
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of the loss of historic fabric and the detailed design of replacements, the windows
harm the appearance and integrity of this grade II listed building and its terrace setting. The
works also fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of
the Queen's Park Estate Conservation Area.
This would not meet policies 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021), nor
policy 5 of the Queen's Park Neighbourhood Plan (November 2022).
The works are also contrary to adopted and published supplementary planning guidance,
namely 'Queen's Park Estate Design Guide' (City of Westminster: 1995), the Queen's Park
Estate Conservation Area Audit (City of Westminster: 2005) and 'Repairs and Alterations to
Listed Buildings' (City of Westminster:1996).
1
Because of the loss of historic fabric and the detailed design of replacements, the windows
harm the appearance and integrity of this grade II listed building and its terrace setting. The
works also fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of
the Queen's Park Estate Conservation Area.
This would not meet policies 38, 39 and 40 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (April 2021), nor
policy 5 of the Queen's Park Neighbourhood Plan (November 2022).
The works are also contrary to adopted and published supplementary planning guidance,
namely 'Queen's Park Estate Design Guide' (City of Westminster: 1995), the Queen's Park
Estate Conservation Area Audit (City of Westminster: 2005) and 'Repairs and Alterations to
Listed Buildings' (City of Westminster:1996).
Policies cited
City Plan 38City Plan 39City Plan 40Queen's Park Neighbourhood Plan 5
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.