Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasWestminsterKnightsbridge & Belgravia ward26/00514/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

26/00514/FULL.

13 - 15 Princes Gate London SW7 1PT

Full / Other Planning at 13 - 15 Princes Gate London SW7 1PT, received 29 Jan 2026 — refused on 1 Jun 2026 (delegated, Morgan Cheung).

WestminsterKnightsbridge & BelgraviaSW7 1PT26/00514/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Jun 2026
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
19
Documents
19 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of free standing pole mounted CCTV cameras to monitor parking spaces.

Reference
26/00514/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW7 1PT
Received
29 Jan 2026
Target date
26 Mar 2026
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00514/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW7 1PT
Received
29 Jan 2026
Target date
26 Mar 2026
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
1 Jun 2026
DELEGATED REPORT
1 Jun 2026
ACK-GENERAL LETTER (G/P/C)
11 Mar 2026
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
11 Mar 2026
SITE NOTICE 21 OR 28 DAYS IF T&C APPL.
11 Mar 2026
ECNSLT-INTERNAL CONSULTS
11 Mar 2026
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
11 Mar 2026
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
11 Mar 2026
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
10 Mar 2026
PENTBRIDGE LETTER OF SUPPORT
7 Mar 2026
REFUSAL-FULL PP [PE]
1 Jun 2026
DELEGATED REPORT
1 Jun 2026
ACK-GENERAL LETTER (G/P/C)
11 Mar 2026
Show all 10 rows
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION LETTER (21D)
11 Mar 2026
SITE NOTICE 21 OR 28 DAYS IF T&C APPL.
11 Mar 2026
ECNSLT-INTERNAL CONSULTS
11 Mar 2026
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
11 Mar 2026
CNSLT-LA SOCIETY
11 Mar 2026
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
10 Mar 2026
PENTBRIDGE LETTER OF SUPPORT
7 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Morgan Cheung — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Jan 2026
Application received
26 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Morgan Cheung
29 Jan 2026
Application received
26 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Morgan Cheung

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Because of their size, appearance and location the proposed CCTV cameras and poles would harm the setting of the neighbouring grade II listed building at 14-25 Princes Gate. This would not meet Policy 44 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (January 2026). (X20AD)
2
Because of their size, appearance and location the proposed CCTV cameras and poles would fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Knightsbridge Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 42, 44, 45, 48 and 49 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (January 2026).
1
Because of their size, appearance and location the proposed CCTV cameras and poles would harm the setting of the neighbouring grade II listed building at 14-25 Princes Gate. This would not meet Policy 44 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (January 2026). (X20AD)
2
Because of their size, appearance and location the proposed CCTV cameras and poles would fail to maintain or improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Knightsbridge Conservation Area. This would not meet Policies 42, 44, 45, 48 and 49 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (January 2026).
Policies cited
City Plan 44City Plan 42City Plan 45City Plan 48City Plan 49

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.