Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Variation of Condition 1 of planning permission dated 5 January 2024 (RN: 23/02189/FULL) for 'Erection of single storey rear extension and alterations to front elevation including new windows and doors and enlarged front lightwell with stair'. NAMELY, to add new cast stone parapet screening, decorative architrave to windows, decorative metal screen to front windows, replacement of decorative balustrade with black painted metal balustrade, projecting portico and columns to entrance and coping stone to existing boundary wall.
Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 May 2026, delegated decision by Frederica Cooney — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
5 Mar 2026
Application received
23 Mar 2026
Application validated
18 May 2026
Statutory target date
18 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Frederica Cooney
5 Mar 2026
Application received
23 Mar 2026
Application validated
18 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Frederica Cooney
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed changes to the parapet screening, projecting portico and columns to entrance and
coping stone to existing boundary wall would change the operative part of the development that we
approved on 05 January 2024 (23/02189/FULL. Applications under Section 73 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 (as amended) may not be used to amend the operative part of a planning permission
or to impose conditions which would be inconsistent with the operative part of the original planning
permission.
2
Because of the parapet screening, architrave to windows, metal screen to front windows, balustrade
with black painted metal balustrade, projecting portico and columns to entrance and coping stone to
existing boundary wall, the works would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or
improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area. This
would not meet Policies 42, 44 and 45 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (January 2026). (X16AD)
1
The proposed changes to the parapet screening, projecting portico and columns to entrance and
coping stone to existing boundary wall would change the operative part of the development that we
approved on 05 January 2024 (23/02189/FULL. Applications under Section 73 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 (as amended) may not be used to amend the operative part of a planning permission
or to impose conditions which would be inconsistent with the operative part of the original planning
permission.
2
Because of the parapet screening, architrave to windows, metal screen to front windows, balustrade
with black painted metal balustrade, projecting portico and columns to entrance and coping stone to
existing boundary wall, the works would harm the appearance of this building and fail to maintain or
improve (preserve or enhance) the character and appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area. This
would not meet Policies 42, 44 and 45 of the City Plan 2019 - 2040 (January 2026). (X16AD)
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.