Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Westminster›…West End ward›96/00280/CAC
Planning application · Westminster

96/00280/CAC.

Oxford Circus House 245 Oxford Street London W1D 2LX

Listed Building at Oxford Circus House 245 Oxford Street London W1D 2LX, received 23 Jan 1996 — not required on 19 Feb 1996 (delegated, Ken Powell).

Westminster›West End›W1D 2LX›96/00280/CAC
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Not required
Outcome
19 Feb 1996
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING METAL WINDOWS WITH SIMILAR UPVC UNITS & GENERAL REPAIR TO EXTERNAL FABRIC REPLACING LIKE FOR LIKE;MINOR ALTERATIONS

Reference
96/00280/CAC
Type
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W1D 2LX
Ward
Council
Received
23 Jan 1996
Decision date
19 Feb 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
96/00280/CAC
Type
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W1D 2LX
Ward
Council
Received
23 Jan 1996
Decision date
19 Feb 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
25 Mar 2017
Decision Notice
25 Mar 2017

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 19 Feb 1996, delegated decision by Ken Powell — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Jan 1996
Application received
19 Feb 1996
Delegated decision: Not required · Ken Powell
23 Jan 1996
Application received
19 Feb 1996
Delegated decision: Not required · Ken Powell

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.