Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Westminster›…St James's wardWC2R 0DW›96/09473/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

96/09473/FULL.

Cecil Chambers East 86 Strand London WC2R 0DW

Full / Other Planning at Cecil Chambers East 86 Strand London WC2R 0DW, received 1 Nov 1996 — withdrawn on 16 Oct 1997 (delegated, Amanda Jackson).

Westminster›St James's›WC2R 0DW›96/09473/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
16 Oct 1997
50 wks
Decision time
42 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

CONVERSION OF OFFICES ON PART 1ST FLOOR & ALL OF 2ND TO 7TH FLOORS (INCLUSIVE) TO FORM 45 NEW FLATS, INSTALLATION OF ROOF PLANT

Reference
96/09473/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Nov 1996
Validated
3 Dec 1996
Decision date
16 Oct 1997
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Reference
96/09473/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Nov 1996
Validated
3 Dec 1996
Decision date
16 Oct 1997
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 16 Oct 1997, delegated decision by Amanda Jackson — 50 weeks from submission (42 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Nov 1996
Application received
3 Dec 1996
Application validated
16 Oct 1997
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Amanda Jackson
1 Nov 1996
Application received
3 Dec 1996
Application validated
16 Oct 1997
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Amanda Jackson

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.