Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Westminster›…Little Venice ward›98/05937/FULL
Planning application · Westminster

98/05937/FULL.

22 Clifton Road London W9 1ST

Full / Other Planning at 22 Clifton Road London W9 1ST, received 15 Jul 1998 — refused on 17 Dec 1998 (delegated, Jim Smith).

Westminster›Little Venice›W9 1ST›98/05937/FULL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationWestminster profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Dec 1998
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Westminster planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

TEMPORARY USE OF 1ST FLOOR INTO COMMERCIAL A2 BUSINESS USE FOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF 3 YEARS

Reference
98/05937/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W9 1ST
Ward
Council
Received
15 Jul 1998
Validated
16 Jul 1998
Decision date
17 Dec 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
98/05937/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W9 1ST
Ward
Council
Received
15 Jul 1998
Validated
16 Jul 1998
Decision date
17 Dec 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
25 Mar 2017
Decision Notice
25 Mar 2017

Documents open on the Westminster portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Dec 1998, delegated decision by Jim Smith — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Jul 1998
Application received
16 Jul 1998
Application validated
17 Dec 1998
Delegated decision: Refused · Jim Smith
15 Jul 1998
Application received
16 Jul 1998
Application validated
17 Dec 1998
Delegated decision: Refused · Jim Smith

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.