Planning Atlas
InvestigationsThe Delegation Gap
Planning AtlasInvestigationsThe Delegation Gap
Who really decides · Free · London-wide

Officers or committee?

Every council sets a scheme of delegation determining which applications officers may decide and which go to committee. This shows the split recorded in each borough. It does not assume that delegation alone makes decisions faster or changes their outcome.

Delegated decisions, by borough
Loading map…
At a glance · London
96%
delegated to officers
withheld · no committee rows recorded
4%
decided by committee
coverage cannot support a rate
497,793
classified decisions
unclassified decision levels excluded
Borough-by-borough breakdown

Share of classified decision-level records handled under delegated powers. Sorted highest first.

1Redbridge99.8%
2Haringey99.5%
3Richmond Upon Thames99.5%
4Ealing99.5%
5Brent99.4%
6Waltham Forest99.4%
7Enfield99.3%
8Merton99.3%
9Bexley99.3%
10Lambeth99.3%
11Hackney99.2%
12Kingston Upon Thames99.1%
13Tower Hamlets99.1%
14Croydon99.0%
15Lewisham99.0%
+ 18 more
Related — follow the thread
Committee Watch
When committees overrule their planning officers
Case Officer Variation
The same application lives or dies by who picks it up
All investigations
The rest of the intelligence
Sources & method
Delegated and committee counts come from the published decision-level field in each borough's canonical planning record. Percentages use delegated ÷ (delegated + committee). Records without a classified decision level are excluded, and the figures describe route rather than speed, quality or political influence.