Planning application · Barnet
20/1764/RCU.
Flat 1 24 Loring Road London N20 0UH
Full / Other Planning at Flat 1 24 Loring Road London N20 0UH, received 9 Apr 2020 — refused on 26 Aug 2020 (delegated, Mansoor Cohen).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Aug 2020
20 wks
Decision time
12 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
20
Documents
20 linked
10
Objections
2 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear conservatory (retrospective)
Reference
20/1764/RCU
Type
Retention/Continued Use
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N20 0UH
Ward
Council
Received
9 Apr 2020
Validated
3 Jul 2020
Target date
28 Aug 2020
Decision date
26 Aug 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
20/1764/RCU
Type
Retention/Continued Use
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N20 0UH
Ward
Council
Received
9 Apr 2020
Validated
3 Jul 2020
Target date
28 Aug 2020
Decision date
26 Aug 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 26 Aug 2020, delegated decision by Mansoor Cohen — 20 weeks from submission (12 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 Apr 2020
Application received
3 Jul 2020
Application validated
28 Aug 2020
Statutory target date
26 Aug 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Mansoor Cohen
9 Apr 2020
Application received
3 Jul 2020
Application validated
28 Aug 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Aug 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Mansoor Cohen
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The 'as built' single storey rear extension by reason of its size, height, scale, siting,
design and excessive rearward projection when combined with existing
enlargements would result in a disproportionate, incongruous and overly dominant
addition to the host dwelling detrimental to the character and appearance of the
host property, neighbouring properties and surrounding area, contrary to Policy
DM01 of the Barnet Development Management Policies DPD (2012), Policies CS1
and CS5 of the Barnet Core Strategy (2012), Policy 7.6 of the London Plan (2016)
and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016)
2
The 'as built' single storey rear extension by virtue of its height, size, siting, design
and excessive rearward projection results in a visually obtrusive and overbearing
impact when viewed from the neighbouring garden, no.22 and no.26 Loring Road,
leading to a loss of light/sunlight, overshadowing and unacceptable level of
overlooking to no.26 due to the side window, to the detriment of the visual and
residential amenities of the neighbouring occupiers, in specific Nos.26 Loring Road,
contrary to Policies CS1 and CS5 of Barnet's Adopted Core Strategy DPD (2012);
Policies DM01 and DM02 of the Adopted Development Management Policies DPD
(2012) and the LB Barnet: Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016)
1
The 'as built' single storey rear extension by reason of its size, height, scale, siting,
design and excessive rearward projection when combined with existing
enlargements would result in a disproportionate, incongruous and overly dominant
addition to the host dwelling detrimental to the character and appearance of the
host property, neighbouring properties and surrounding area, contrary to Policy
DM01 of the Barnet Development Management Policies DPD (2012), Policies CS1
and CS5 of the Barnet Core Strategy (2012), Policy 7.6 of the London Plan (2016)
and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016)
2
The 'as built' single storey rear extension by virtue of its height, size, siting, design
and excessive rearward projection results in a visually obtrusive and overbearing
impact when viewed from the neighbouring garden, no.22 and no.26 Loring Road,
leading to a loss of light/sunlight, overshadowing and unacceptable level of
overlooking to no.26 due to the side window, to the detriment of the visual and
residential amenities of the neighbouring occupiers, in specific Nos.26 Loring Road,
contrary to Policies CS1 and CS5 of Barnet's Adopted Core Strategy DPD (2012);
Policies DM01 and DM02 of the Adopted Development Management Policies DPD
(2012) and the LB Barnet: Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016)
Policies cited
DM01CS1CS5London Plan 7.6DM02
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
10
In support
2
Total comments
12
Objections
10
In support
2
Total comments
12
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.