Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarnetHendon ward21/1049/HSE
Planning application · Barnet

21/1049/HSE.

32 Rowsley Avenue London NW4 1AJ

Householder at 32 Rowsley Avenue London NW4 1AJ, received 26 Feb 2021 — refused on 11 Feb 2022 by committee.

BarnetHendonNW4 1AJ21/1049/HSE
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Feb 2022
50 wks
Decision time
42 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
7
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Allow
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed merging of the single storey rear extension with crown roof and rear patio. Erection of single storey side and first floor rear extension. Retention of front extension facilitating a front porch and canopy (AMENDED DESCRIPTION AND DRAWINGS)

Reference
21/1049/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
NW4 1AJ
Ward
Council
Received
26 Feb 2021
Validated
5 Mar 2021
Target date
30 Apr 2021
Decision date
11 Feb 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Reference
21/1049/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
NW4 1AJ
Ward
Council
Received
26 Feb 2021
Validated
5 Mar 2021
Target date
30 Apr 2021
Decision date
11 Feb 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN: REFUSE HSE
11 Feb 2022
ACCOMPANYING INFORMATION TO OBJECTIONS
1 Feb 2022
COMMENT(FULL)
31 Jan 2022
COMMENT(FULL)
31 Jan 2022
FINAL EXISTING DRAWINGS
17 Jan 2022
FINAL PROPOSED DRAWINGS
17 Jan 2022
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
DN: REFUSE HSE
11 Feb 2022
ACCOMPANYING INFORMATION TO OBJECTIONS
1 Feb 2022
COMMENT(FULL)
31 Jan 2022
Show all 10 rows
COMMENT(FULL)
31 Jan 2022
FINAL EXISTING DRAWINGS
17 Jan 2022
FINAL PROPOSED DRAWINGS
17 Jan 2022
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021
COMMENT(FULL)
12 Apr 2021

Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 Feb 2022, determined by the planning committee — 50 weeks from submission (42 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Feb 2021
Application received
5 Mar 2021
Application validated
30 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
11 Feb 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Allow · Allow
26 Feb 2021
Application received
5 Mar 2021
Application validated
30 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
11 Feb 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Allow · Allow

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The cumulative impact of the proposed formation of a crown roof to the existing ground floor rear extension, by reason of its height, siting, and excessive rearward projection, would give rise to an unacceptable loss of outlook and overbearing sense of enclosure to the rear habitable rooms and garden of No 30 Rowsley Avenue, to the detriment of the residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers, contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan (2016), Policy CS5 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Core Strategy) DPD (2012), Policies DM01 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Development Management Policies) DPD (2012) and the Residential Design Guide SPD (2016).
1
The cumulative impact of the proposed formation of a crown roof to the existing ground floor rear extension, by reason of its height, siting, and excessive rearward projection, would give rise to an unacceptable loss of outlook and overbearing sense of enclosure to the rear habitable rooms and garden of No 30 Rowsley Avenue, to the detriment of the residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers, contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan (2016), Policy CS5 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Core Strategy) DPD (2012), Policies DM01 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Development Management Policies) DPD (2012) and the Residential Design Guide SPD (2016).
Policies cited
D6

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Allow
Outcome: Allow
Allow
Outcome: Allow

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
7
In support
0
Total comments
7
Objections
7
In support
0
Total comments
7
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.