Planning application · Barnet
23/1012/HSE.
Householder at 38 Dale Grove London N12 8EA, received 9 Mar 2023 — refused on 14 Jun 2023 (delegated, Thomas Wong).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Jun 2023
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Roof extension involving side/rear dormer to outrigger
Reference
23/1012/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N12 8EA
Ward
Council
Received
9 Mar 2023
Validated
20 Mar 2023
Target date
15 May 2023
Decision date
14 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
23/1012/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N12 8EA
Ward
Council
Received
9 Mar 2023
Validated
20 Mar 2023
Target date
15 May 2023
Decision date
14 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 14 Jun 2023, delegated decision by Thomas Wong — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 Mar 2023
Application received
20 Mar 2023
Application validated
15 May 2023
Statutory target date
14 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Thomas Wong
9 Mar 2023
Application received
20 Mar 2023
Application validated
15 May 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Thomas Wong
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed side/rear dormer, by reason of its design, scaling and siting would
result in the erection of an inappropriate form of development that would appear as
an excessive, dominating, prominent feature to the host property together with the
existing roof extensions which in turn would have a detrimental impact on the street
scene and surrounding area, contrary to Policies CS1 and CS5 of the LB Barnet:
Local Plan (Core Strategy) DPD (2021), Policy DM01 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan
(Development Management Policies) DPD (2021) and the Residential Design
Guidance SPD (2016)
1
The proposed side/rear dormer, by reason of its design, scaling and siting would
result in the erection of an inappropriate form of development that would appear as
an excessive, dominating, prominent feature to the host property together with the
existing roof extensions which in turn would have a detrimental impact on the street
scene and surrounding area, contrary to Policies CS1 and CS5 of the LB Barnet:
Local Plan (Core Strategy) DPD (2021), Policy DM01 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan
(Development Management Policies) DPD (2021) and the Residential Design
Guidance SPD (2016)
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
1
Total comments
1
Objections
0
In support
1
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.