Planning application · Barnet
24/0319/HSE.
Householder at 95 Millway London NW7 3QT, received 25 Jan 2024 — refused on 3 Jun 2024 (delegated, Ed Hollingworth).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Jun 2024
19 wks
Decision time
11 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal in progress
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part single, part two storey side and rear extensions following demolition of existing garage. Alterations to roof including an increase in ridge height. New raised rear terrace and steps to garden. Two 2-storey bay window extensions to front elevation. Provision of 4no. off-street parking spaces
Reference
24/0319/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
25 Jan 2024
Target date
21 Mar 2024
Decision date
3 Jun 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
24/0319/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
25 Jan 2024
Target date
21 Mar 2024
Decision date
3 Jun 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 3 Jun 2024, delegated decision by Ed Hollingworth — 19 weeks from submission (11 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
25 Jan 2024
Application received
21 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
3 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ed Hollingworth
Appeal
Appeal in progress
25 Jan 2024
Application received
21 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
3 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ed Hollingworth
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal in progress
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its close proximity to
neighbouring properties, siting, design, size and scale, results in an insubordinate,
disproportionate and unsympathetic form of development, which cumulatively with
other extensions proposed would appear incongruous to the established pattern of
development, and fails to preserve the character and appearance of the host
property and surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021);
Policies CS NPPF, CS1 and CS5 of the Local Plan Core Strategy (2012), Policy
DM01 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the
Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).
2
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its close proximity to
neighbouring properties, siting, size and scale, results in a development that has an
overbearing appearance when viewed from adjacent properties, particularly No.97
Millway, resulting in an undue loss of outlook and overshadowing, loss of outlook
and creation of a sense of enclosure, to the detriment of the residential amenity of
neighbouring occupiers, namely those at No.97 Millway, contrary to Policy D3 of the
London Plan (2021), Policy CS5 of LB Barnet Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM01 of
the LB Barnet Development Management Policies DPD (2012), the Sustainable
Design and Construction SPD (2016) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD
(2016).
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its close proximity to
neighbouring properties, siting, design, size and scale, results in an insubordinate,
disproportionate and unsympathetic form of development, which cumulatively with
other extensions proposed would appear incongruous to the established pattern of
development, and fails to preserve the character and appearance of the host
property and surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021);
Policies CS NPPF, CS1 and CS5 of the Local Plan Core Strategy (2012), Policy
DM01 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the
Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).
2
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its close proximity to
neighbouring properties, siting, size and scale, results in a development that has an
overbearing appearance when viewed from adjacent properties, particularly No.97
Millway, resulting in an undue loss of outlook and overshadowing, loss of outlook
and creation of a sense of enclosure, to the detriment of the residential amenity of
neighbouring occupiers, namely those at No.97 Millway, contrary to Policy D3 of the
London Plan (2021), Policy CS5 of LB Barnet Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM01 of
the LB Barnet Development Management Policies DPD (2012), the Sustainable
Design and Construction SPD (2016) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD
(2016).
Policies cited
D3CS1CS5DM01NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal in progress
Outcome not yet recorded
Appeal in progress
Outcome not yet recorded
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.