Planning application · Barnet
24/2280/FUL.
73 - 77 Brent Street London NW4 2EA
Full / Other Planning at 73 - 77 Brent Street London NW4 2EA, received 11 Jun 2024 — refused on 7 Aug 2024 (delegated, Lizzy Ruta).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Aug 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension at second floor to create an additional office floorspace (Use Class E(g))
Reference
24/2280/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW4 2EA
Ward
Council
Received
11 Jun 2024
Validated
12 Jun 2024
Target date
7 Aug 2024
Decision date
7 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
24/2280/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW4 2EA
Ward
Council
Received
11 Jun 2024
Validated
12 Jun 2024
Target date
7 Aug 2024
Decision date
7 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 7 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Lizzy Ruta — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
11 Jun 2024
Application received
12 Jun 2024
Application validated
7 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
7 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Lizzy Ruta
11 Jun 2024
Application received
12 Jun 2024
Application validated
7 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
7 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Lizzy Ruta
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its size, siting, and bulk would appear
unduly overbearing and visually obtrusive, and result in loss of outlook and
increased sense of enclosure to the occupants of the second-floor rear-facing flats,
no.s 1 and 3, at the host site and of the C1 block in the Fosters redevelopment to
the detriment of the residential amenities of neighbouring occupiers, contrary to
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CS5 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Core
Strategy) DPD (2012) and Policy DM01 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Development
Management Policies) DPD (2012).
2
The applicant has failed to provide a satisfactory noise impact assessment to
demonstrate that the development would not result in unacceptable nuisance to
amenities of residents. In the absence of adequate mitigation measures, the
proposal would likely have detrimental impact on the amenities of the occupiers of
the surrounding residential properties. As such the proposal fails to comply with the
NPPF, Policy CS5 of the Local Plan Core Strategy and Policy DM01, DM02 and
DM04 of the Adopted Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD and
Sustainable Design and Construction SPD.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its size, siting, and bulk would appear
unduly overbearing and visually obtrusive, and result in loss of outlook and
increased sense of enclosure to the occupants of the second-floor rear-facing flats,
no.s 1 and 3, at the host site and of the C1 block in the Fosters redevelopment to
the detriment of the residential amenities of neighbouring occupiers, contrary to
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CS5 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Core
Strategy) DPD (2012) and Policy DM01 of the LB Barnet: Local Plan (Development
Management Policies) DPD (2012).
2
The applicant has failed to provide a satisfactory noise impact assessment to
demonstrate that the development would not result in unacceptable nuisance to
amenities of residents. In the absence of adequate mitigation measures, the
proposal would likely have detrimental impact on the amenities of the occupiers of
the surrounding residential properties. As such the proposal fails to comply with the
NPPF, Policy CS5 of the Local Plan Core Strategy and Policy DM01, DM02 and
DM04 of the Adopted Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD and
Sustainable Design and Construction SPD.
Policies cited
D3CS5DM01DM02DM04NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.