Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarnetTotteridge & Woodside ward24/3877/FUL
Planning application · Barnet

24/3877/FUL.

Manaton And Shanklin Holden Avenue London N12 8HX

Full / Other Planning at Manaton And Shanklin Holden Avenue London N12 8HX, received 2 Oct 2024 — refused on 3 Dec 2024 (delegated, Andrew Turner).

BarnetTotteridge & WoodsideN12 8HX24/3877/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Dec 2024
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
46
Documents
46 linked
14
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Dismissed
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of two existing semi-detached houses and construction of a two storey building with rooms in the roofspace comprising of 6no. self-contained flats. Associated cycle storage, parking, refuse and recycling and amenity area

Reference
24/3877/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N12 8HX
Council
Received
2 Oct 2024
Validated
8 Oct 2024
Target date
3 Dec 2024
Decision date
3 Dec 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
24/3877/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N12 8HX
Council
Received
2 Oct 2024
Validated
8 Oct 2024
Target date
3 Dec 2024
Decision date
3 Dec 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
12 Dec 2024
DN: REFUSE FUL
3 Dec 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
7 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
5 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
4 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
4 Nov 2024
DELEGATED REPORT
12 Dec 2024
DN: REFUSE FUL
3 Dec 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
7 Nov 2024
Show all 10 rows
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
6 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
5 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
4 Nov 2024
COMMENT(FULL)
4 Nov 2024

Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Dec 2024, delegated decision by Andrew Turner — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Oct 2024
Application received
8 Oct 2024
Application validated
3 Dec 2024
Statutory target date
3 Dec 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Turner
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Dismissed
2 Oct 2024
Application received
8 Oct 2024
Application validated
3 Dec 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
3 Dec 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Turner
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed building comprising 6no. two storey self-contained flats would, by reason of its size, massing and design as well as location on a corner plot, result in an incongruous form of development, appearing cramped within the streetscene and at odds with the established pattern of development and out of keeping with the prevailing character of the area. It would thus be detrimental to the character and appearance of this part of the streetscene and the surrounding area contrary to Policy CS5 of the LB Barnet Local Plan Core Strategy (adopted 2012), Policy DM01 of the LB Barnet Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (adopted 2012), Policy CDH01 of the LB Barnet (draft) Local Plan (Regulation 25 Stage), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and the LB Barnet Residential Design Guidance SPD (adopted 2016).
2
The proposed development would fail to provide an adequate level of outdoor amenity space for the proposed units, particularly Flats 1 and 2 to the detriment of the amenity and living conditions of future occupiers. The application is therefore considered unacceptable and contrary to Policies DM01 and DM02 of LB Barnet's Development Management Policies Document DPD (2012), Policy CDH01 and CDH07 of the LB Barnet (draft) Local Plan (Regulation 25 Stage), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Barnet's Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) and Barnet's Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016).
1
The proposed building comprising 6no. two storey self-contained flats would, by reason of its size, massing and design as well as location on a corner plot, result in an incongruous form of development, appearing cramped within the streetscene and at odds with the established pattern of development and out of keeping with the prevailing character of the area. It would thus be detrimental to the character and appearance of this part of the streetscene and the surrounding area contrary to Policy CS5 of the LB Barnet Local Plan Core Strategy (adopted 2012), Policy DM01 of the LB Barnet Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (adopted 2012), Policy CDH01 of the LB Barnet (draft) Local Plan (Regulation 25 Stage), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and the LB Barnet Residential Design Guidance SPD (adopted 2016).
2
The proposed development would fail to provide an adequate level of outdoor amenity space for the proposed units, particularly Flats 1 and 2 to the detriment of the amenity and living conditions of future occupiers. The application is therefore considered unacceptable and contrary to Policies DM01 and DM02 of LB Barnet's Development Management Policies Document DPD (2012), Policy CDH01 and CDH07 of the LB Barnet (draft) Local Plan (Regulation 25 Stage), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Barnet's Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) and Barnet's Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016).
Policies cited
CS5DM01D3DM02D6

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
14
In support
0
Total comments
14
Objections
14
In support
0
Total comments
14
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.