Planning application · Barnet
26/0582/HSE.
73 Brent Terrace London NW2 1BY
Householder at 73 Brent Terrace London NW2 1BY, received 16 Feb 2026 — refused on 13 Apr 2026 (delegated, Lottie Burden).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Apr 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey side and rear extension with new patio area following demolition of the existing shed
Reference
26/0582/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 1BY
Ward
Council
Received
16 Feb 2026
Target date
13 Apr 2026
Decision date
13 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
26/0582/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 1BY
Ward
Council
Received
16 Feb 2026
Target date
13 Apr 2026
Decision date
13 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 13 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Lottie Burden — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
16 Feb 2026
Application received
13 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
13 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Lottie Burden
16 Feb 2026
Application received
13 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
13 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Lottie Burden
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By reason of its size, design and siting, the proposed single-storey side and rear
extension would result in an incongruous form of development, appearing out of
scale with the host dwellinghouse, and at odds with the established pattern of
development in the surrounding area, to the detriment of the character and
appearance of the property and the wider terrace, contrary to Policy D3 of the
London Plan (2021), Policies CDH01 and CDH05 of the LB Barnet Local Plan
(2025) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).
2
The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, depth and siting would appear
overbearing, resulting in a loss of outlook and increased sense of enclosure
towards Nos. 72 and 74 Brent Terrace. The proposed development would therefore
be detrimental to the amenities of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties,
contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policies CDH01 and CDH05 of the
Adopted Barnet Local Plan (2025) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD
(2016).
1
By reason of its size, design and siting, the proposed single-storey side and rear
extension would result in an incongruous form of development, appearing out of
scale with the host dwellinghouse, and at odds with the established pattern of
development in the surrounding area, to the detriment of the character and
appearance of the property and the wider terrace, contrary to Policy D3 of the
London Plan (2021), Policies CDH01 and CDH05 of the LB Barnet Local Plan
(2025) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).
2
The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, depth and siting would appear
overbearing, resulting in a loss of outlook and increased sense of enclosure
towards Nos. 72 and 74 Brent Terrace. The proposed development would therefore
be detrimental to the amenities of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties,
contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policies CDH01 and CDH05 of the
Adopted Barnet Local Plan (2025) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD
(2016).
Policies cited
D3CDH01CDH05D6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.